"Thank
you for coming to engage with the committee to study the nature of the church
in the 21st Century! We plan on leaving time at the end for
questions and conversation, but we first wanted to share with you more about
the work of our committee over the past year and a half.
As
we began to meet and worship together, we found ourselves repeatedly drawn to
the second chapter of Acts. The disciples’ world had been forever changed by
Jesus’ ministry, crucifixion, and resurrection, and they found themselves gathered
in a room, waiting for what would happen next. As they waited, they prayed, and
prayed, and waited. Suddenly, with the sound of a violent wind, the Holy Spirit
rushed into the room and came upon those gathered together. These followers of
Jesus became the Body of Christ.
The
story could have ended there, with the followers of Jesus worshiping among
themselves, but it didn’t. Instead, the Holy Spirit sent this group of women
and men into the streets of Jerusalem, where a diverse crowd was gathered for
the Pentecost holiday. They began speaking in the languages of those
gathered, and empowered by the
Holy Spirit, these followers of Jesus witnessed to everyone, sharing the good
news that they had come to know through Jesus Christ.
On
that day alone, we read that three thousand were added to their number. They
became brothers and sisters in Christ with a great diversity of people.
Together, they devoted themselves to teaching, fellowship, breaking of bread,
sharing resources, and prayer together. And God continued to add to their
numbers, day by day.
But
what if they hadn’t left the room? What if they stayed in their small group, in
the enclosed room, not venturing beyond those comfortable walls? Sure, they
probably would have grown a little bit. They may have been welcoming, accepting
visitors and new members – as long as they didn’t try to change anything, and
especially if they looked like and talked like those already in the room. After
a while, they would begin to fight over dwindling resources, fretting over the
future. What if they hadn’t left the room?
As
we prayed about the future of the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) in the 21st
Century, we asked ourselves, “Will we, as Presbyterians in the 21st Century,
leave our rooms? Will we venture from our comfortable sanctuaries? Will we go
out into the streets, learning different languages, embracing diversity,
planting new congregations, and proclaiming the good news of Jesus Christ?”
As
we gathered, we prayed, and prayed and continue to wait for the transforming
power of the Holy Spirit in our midst."
Carol then shared some of our findings regarding changing cultural and church contexts, current roadblocks in moving forward, and examples of exciting worshipping communities around the country, including a few here in Pittsburgh.
I continued...
"In
addressing the changing contexts and our challenges in this century, our
committee has come up with a number of recommendations. You can read all of our
recommendations on pc-biz, but we want to highlight a few areas of focus.
A
number of our recommendations respond directly to the need to form and support
a diversity of new worshipping communities. There are immigrant congregations
coming into this country from Presbyterian denominations who want to be part of
the Presbyterian church but face a myriad of obstacles. We need to address and
work to remove those obstacles. We need to adequately resource the development
of new churches and new worshipping committees, in money and other material
resources, but also by working with our Seminaries and presbyteries to help
prepare ministers to plant new churches and to minister in changing contexts.
Even
as we are supporting and nurturing new ministries, we recognize that churches
are not called to exist in perpetuity. As many congregations dwindle to the
point of simply maintaining buildings, we call on leaders in the church to
assist those congregations and communities in discerning their call in this
time and place. Some churches will be revitalized in new ways; others may
discern a call to close. As churches close, we call presbyteries to use the
assets to support new church and mission development.
We
recognize that there are still many inequalities in our society and in the
church, and we call the PC(USA) to a role as social witness. We also recognize
that we must continue to work to identify and support leaders in churches, in
councils, and in our Seminaries from underrepresented populations, and a number
of our recommendations address those needs. We call on the church to repent of
our continued complicity in prejudice and find a need for specific training for
all leaders in the church around issues of privilege, diversity, and
cross-cultural proficiency. We also look at the current communication
strategies of the denomination. While we have made great strides in translating
documents and resources into languages other than English, including Spanish,
Korean, and Portuguese, our overall accessibility to those who speak a language
other than English remains quite low. We have concrete recommendations to
address that.
As
we look at changing needs in church leadership and ministry, we recognize that
bivocational ministry will be a critical component of church leadership in the
coming decades. This is often scary or threatening for many of us teaching
elders, but this will be not just a practical need, but a missional need for
the church. We are calling for the creation of a special task force to look at
bivocational ministry from a holistic standpoint, and from each level of the
church, so that we can better know how to foster and support this emerging
ministry front in our denomination.
Bivocational
ministry is tied into issues of just compensation. Also related are
already-noted concerns of inequalities within our society and in churches,
particularly as women and underrepresented populations are concerned. We offer
a number of recommendations to study and better understand the extent of these
concerns, and to address them through policies guided by a theological
understanding of stewardship and compensation.
One
of the charges given our committee by the previous General Assembly was the
creation of resources that could be used in churches and councils. Given the
timeline and scope of our work, we were not able to do this, and so we suggest
empowering a group, including some members of our current committee, to
continue that work to create and disseminate resources in the church.
That
is an overview of our work as a committee. We have appreciated the opportunity
to study these important questions, and the conversations that we have had with
so many church members, elders, and leaders throughout the denomination. We
look forward to continuing that conversation."
Stephanie, Thank you for your amazing work for the denomination! I have just begun to read the report, and I am amazed by its scope and detail. Looking forward to talking more about it. I have shared it with our Presbytery Task Group for their reflection and preparation. Prayers for the Assembly!
ReplyDelete